Home / Services / Technical Cleanliness Testing Laboratory / ISO 16232 & VDA 19 Compliant Testing

ISO 16232 and VDA 19.1 Cleanliness Testing

Laboratory staff running an automated particle count on the Jomesa HFD microscope, with the scanned analysis filter and flagged particles on screen

What ISO 16232 cleanliness testing measures

ISO 16232 and VDA 19.1 describe one inspection sequence for the particles left on the controlled surfaces of a component after machining, washing or assembly. The particles are removed by a qualified extraction, in our laboratory a liquid one, collected on an analysis filter, then weighed, counted, sized and classified. Our laboratory in Monroe, Michigan runs that full sequence. It is ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited (PJLA) for ISO 16232 / VDA 19.1 particle counting and SEM-EDS elemental analysis of automotive components. The scope of accreditation is on our ISO/IEC 17025:2017 page.

This page walks through the method step by step. Material identification of what is found is on the SEM-EDS particle analysis page.

The test sequence

The seven steps below are the same for every part. Your specification sets the parameters, the reference unit and the limits inside them.

1. Extraction method selection

Both documents describe five liquid extraction methods (pressure rinsing, internal rinsing, ultrasonic bath, agitation and dissolving) and air extraction. Our laboratory runs the first four liquid methods. Pressure rinsing covers exterior and accessible surfaces. Internal rinsing flushes wetted internal passages. Ultrasonic bath suits small parts and complex surfaces. Agitation suits parts that can be filled and shaken. The part and the specification decide; if your specification fixes the method and start parameters, we run those. Extractions take place in our PALL PCC61 and Gläser ACM18 ISO Class 5 extraction cabinets.

2. Blank value

We first run the procedure without the part. The blank value captures particles from the test liquid, cabinet, glassware and environment, and the standards cap it at 10 percent of the required cleanliness value. It is recorded in the report and is not subtracted from the result.

3. Declining test

A new component or component family is qualified by repeating the extraction, up to six times, on the same part. The criterion is met at the first step whose yield is 10 percent or less of everything collected up to and including that step. The routine procedure is built from the steps it took to get there, which shows the procedure is removing the contamination present rather than a fraction of it. If six steps do not reach the criterion, the parameters are intensified and the test repeated.

4. Filtration and membrane drying

We draw the extraction liquid through an analysis filter chosen for particle retention, chemical resistance to the test liquid and optical contrast. The filter then dries in our CleanTec membrane drying system or Quincy Lab 30GC gravity convection oven. When gravimetry is specified, we condition the filter to constant weight before and after filtration.

5. Gravimetric residue

The residue mass is the difference between the two conditioned filter weights. We measure it on an Ohaus analytical balance with 0.01 mg readability and normalize it per 1,000 cm² of wetted surface or per 100 cm³ of wetted volume. Mass says nothing about particle size or count, so a specification that must control large or hard particles also needs a size distribution.

6. Automated particle counting and sizing on the Jomesa HFD

The Jomesa High Focal Depth microscope scans the whole filter, detects each particle and measures its length (maximum Feret diameter) and width. Particles are counted into the size classes shared by both standards, class B (5 to 15 microns) through class N (3,000 microns and above). That is the 5 to 3,000+ micron range. Two polarization images separate metallic-shiny from non-metallic particles. Fibers are typified by shape: stretched length more than 20 times the maximum inner circle diameter, that diameter 50 microns or less, and not metallic shiny. VDA 19.1 has the longest or widest particle in each category recorded as an image.

7. Reporting

The standards require the inspection report to document the extraction method and parameters, the filtration and analysis conditions, and the results. For cleanliness testing to either document, the results are the size-class table with all particles, metallic-shiny particles and fibers, plus the gravimetric residue when specified. They are laid out in the same units as your limits. Counts are normalized to your reference unit: A (per 1,000 cm² of wetted surface), V (per 100 cm³ of wetted volume) or N (per component). A Component Cleanliness Code can be added. Example: A(B-E17/F-G14/H-I4/J-K2/L-N00). Particles that need a material identification are relocated from the HFD to the Jomesa PSE for SEM-EDS elemental analysis.

VDA 19.1 and ISO 16232

The two documents share the same extraction methods, declining test, blank value criterion, Feret sizing, fiber definition, size classes and contamination levels. One extraction and analysis program can therefore be reported to either. VDA 19.1 (often cited simply as VDA 19) is an industry recommendation; ISO 16232 is an International Standard. Both are on our accredited scope. Tell us which document your specification cites and the report follows its notation.

Typical components

The method applies to the component, not the operating fluid. We test the particles that come off fuel, fluid and engine system parts, which is a different measurement from ISO 4406 fluid sampling. Typical parts:

  • Engine blocks, crankshafts and turbine shafts, including large diesel components up to 2 tons
  • Fuel and fluid system components and engine assemblies
  • Castings and machined parts, before and after cleaning, deburring or assembly

Specification and lot size

  • The specification: the document and revision (ISO 16232:2018 or VDA 19.1, plus the OEM specification whose limits apply) and the reference unit. Include the limits per size class, any gravimetric or largest-particle limit, and fixed extraction parameters if your customer defines them.
  • Lot size follows the reference unit: enough parts to reach the sampled area a per-1,000 cm² limit implies, or enough surface for a measurable gravimetric residue. See the FAQ below.

Packaging, drawings and return shipping are covered on the technical cleanliness testing laboratory page. If a lot fails, precision cleaning and parts washing on the same campus can re-clean it and the laboratory can test it again. Contact the lab with your specification for a quote.

Equipment

  • Jomesa High Focal Depth (HFD) digital optical microscope
  • PALL PCC61 ISO Class 5 cleanliness extraction cabinet
  • Gläser ACM18 ISO Class 5 cleanliness extraction cabinet
  • Extraction by pressure rinsing, ultrasonic bath, internal rinsing and agitation
  • Ohaus analytical balance, 0.01 mg
  • CleanTec membrane drying system
  • Quincy Lab 30GC gravity convection oven
  • Gorbel powered 2-ton and 1/2-ton bridge cranes

Frequently asked questions

A declining test qualifies the extraction procedure. The extraction is repeated on the same part, up to six times, until one step yields 10 percent or less of the total collected so far. The routine procedure is built from those steps. The standards require it once for a new component or component family. It is repeated when the part or its process changes enough that the existing procedure may no longer remove the contamination. Parameters already qualified, or carried over within a component family, can be confirmed with a double inspection: two extractions at a 30 percent criterion. Qualification results go in a separate qualification report, not in the inspection report.

No. The blank value is the contamination the procedure itself contributes. The standards hold it to 10 percent of the required cleanliness value, and VDA 19.1 states outright that it may not be subtracted from the component result. The limit follows from your specification: a class that allows 90 particles allows 9 in the blank, and a 7 mg gravimetric limit allows 0.7 mg. If the blank is over its limit, the cause has to be found in the liquid, equipment or environment. VDA 19.1 has a blank that fails on a completed inspection evaluated and noted in the inspection report.

Not by itself. The optical count typifies particles as metallic shiny by comparing two polarization images, as the standards describe. That is an optical estimate: oxidized metal may not shine, and some non-metals do. When the material matters, for example steel chips versus abrasive grit or casting sand, the flagged particles are relocated to the Jomesa PSE. SEM-EDS elemental analysis there identifies the material class.

Each limit type maps to a measurement in the same cleanliness testing sequence. A largest-particle limit corresponds to the longest particle measured in each category (all particles, metallic shiny, fibers), which VDA 19.1 has recorded as an image. A gravimetric limit corresponds to the residue mass in milligrams, normalized per 1,000 cm² or per 100 cm³. Limits per size class correspond to the size-class table, per 1,000 cm², per 100 cm³ or per part. Coding is optional in both documents, so a Component Cleanliness Code is added only when your specification uses one.

It depends on the reference unit in the specification. A limit per 1,000 cm² of wetted surface on a small part needs enough parts to reach a meaningful sampled area. VDA 19.1 gives 200 cm² of sampled surface as an approximate reference for the smallest inspection lot when pressure rinsing small parts. A gravimetric limit needs enough surface for a measurable residue. A per-part limit refers to one component. Ask before shipping and we will confirm a lot size against your specification.

Our Certifications

Talk to an Expert – Get Answers Now.

Our specialists are ready to provide fast, reliable solutions tailored to your needs.